Katie Nasswetter, Senior Development Planner, summarized the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the reuse of the existing building as transitional housing. Katie provided details on the site context, Official Plan designation, current and proposed zoning, requested specialized zoning regulations, proposed site plan and proposed building elevations.
Dave Aston, MHBC Planning, Urban Design and Landscape Architecture, speaking on behalf of the applicant, provided a high level review of the site operations and how to engage in this topic. Dave provided comments on how this application can support a need in the community and the proposed updates to the site as it relates to the proposed zoning changes.
Susan Watson provided comments in favour of the application and how the proposed changes could impact the local community, and also provided comments regarding parkland considerations as it relates to the site.
Jason Blokhuis provided comments regarding impacts to adjacent properties, parking and the interior design of the building.
Stephen Kilburn, an area resident, commented on multiple zoning considerations as it relates to the application, and expressed concerns about the interior design of the building.
Gail Hoekstra provided comments on the intended use of the site and gave comparison to other similar sites within the City of Guelph.
Susan Bushell, an area resident, spoke about concerns as a user of adjacent properties.
John Anderson, an area resident, provided concerns regarding the design of the building and the multiple zoning changes requested.
Matt Sheehy, ASnow Alliance, provided comments as it relates to the property and its operations. Mayor Guthrie requested that the delegate continue their delegation towards the Planning matters of the application. The delegate chose not to continue.
Karen Kowalchuk, an area resident, spoke regarding the impacts of the property’s green space on the local area, and raised concerns about parking, hard surface areas, heritage aspects and interior design.
Council recessed at 8:30 p.m. to allow time for delegations to call into the remote meeting to speak to the item. Council reconvened at 8:34 p.m.
Robert Eilers, an area resident, expressed concerns regarding the preservation of heritage aspects of the property, property access, and impacts to the access of adjacent sites.
Mark Enchin provided concerns as it relates to the application and its proposed operation.
The following delegation withdrew and did not speak:
Mark Post