Minutes of Guelph City CouncilTuesday, April 08, 2025 at 3:30 P.m. - 10:00 P.m.Council ChambersGuelph City Hall, 1 Carden StreetCouncil:Mayor C. GuthrieCouncillor P. AlltCouncillor C. BillingsCouncillor L. BusuttilCouncillor L. CaronCouncillor E. CatonCouncillor K. ChewCouncillor C. DownerCouncillor D. GibsonCouncillor R. GollerCouncillor C. KlassenAbsent:Councillor D. O'RourkeCouncillor M. RichardsonStaff:T. Baker, Chief Administrative OfficerC. Clack-Bush, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, Public ServicesJ. Holmes, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, Infrastructure, Development and EnvironmentJ. Sales, General Manager, Strategy, Innovation and Intergovernmental ServicesK. Walkey, General Manager, Planning and Building ServicesC. DeVriendt, Manager, Development PlanningS. Laughlin, Downtown Revitalization AdvisorD. McKenzie, Planner II, Affordable HousingS. Robinson, Planner III, Senior Heritage PlannerL. Sulatycki, Planner III, Senior PlannerG. Meades, Acting Manager, Legislative Services/Deputy ClerkG. Brennan, Council and Committee CoordinatorC. Murray-Sprague, Election CoordinatorA. Sandor, Council and Committee Coordinator J. Tang, Legislative CoordinatorAlso Present:J. Giancola, Dillon ConsultingJ. Tinney, SvN Architects and Planners2.Call to Order Mayor Guthrie called the meeting to order. (3:34 p.m.)2.1Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest or General Nature Thereof There were no disclosures.3.Authority to move into closed meeting Moved ByCouncillor AlltSeconded ByCouncillor Klassen That the Council of the City of Guelph now hold a meeting that is closed to the public, pursuant to Section 239(2)(e) and (f) of the Municipal Act, regarding litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose. CarriedThe following items were considered:3.1Call to Order (closed meeting) Public Comments: 3.2Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof Public Comments: 3.3895 and 919 York Road – Ontario Land Tribunal Update, 2025-157 Public Comments: 3.4Proposed Employment Land Acquisition – Update Public Comments: 4.Closed Meeting Summary Mayor Guthrie called the meeting to order (4:00 p.m.) Mayor Guthrie noted the following: 895 and 919 York Road – Ontario Land Tribunal Update, 2025-157 Council received information and gave direction to staff. Proposed Employment Land Acquisition – Update Council received information and gave direction to staff.5.Open Meeting – 4:00 p.m. 5.4Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof There were no disclosures. 6.Council Consent Agenda Moved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That the April 8, 2025 Council Consent Agenda identified below be adopted. 6.152 Paisley Street – Notice of Intention to Designate , 2025-151 1.52 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-151.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(4).pdf That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 52 Paisley Street pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation by-law be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period. 6.254 Paisley Street – Notice of Intention to Designate, 2025-152 1.54 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-152.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(5).pdf That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 54 Paisley Street pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation by-law be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period. 6.356 Paisley Street – Notice of Intention to Designate, 2025-153 1.56 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-153.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(6).pdf That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 56 Paisley Street pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation by-law be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period. 6.4136 Glasgow Street North – Notice of Intention to Designate, 2025-131 1.136 Glasgow Street North - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-131.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(1).pdf That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 136 Glasgow Street North pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation bylaw be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period. 6.530 Eramosa Road – Notice of Intention to Designate, 2025-102 1.30 Eramosa Road - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-102.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(2).pdf That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 30 Eramosa Road pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation bylaw be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period. 6.632 Eramosa Road – Notice of Intention to Designate, 2025-103 1.32 Eramosa Road - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-103.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(3).pdf That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 32 Eramosa Road pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation bylaw be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period. 6.79 and 13 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-138 1.9 and 13 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-138.pdf2.Attachment-1 Criteria to Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.pdf That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 13 Paisley Street pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation bylaw be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period. 6.815 and 17 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-139 1.15 and 17 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-139.pdf2.Attachment-1 Criteria to Determine Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.pdf That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 15 and 17 Paisley Street pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation bylaw be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period. Voting in Favour: (11)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Caton, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewCarried (11 to 0)7.Public Meeting to Hear Applications Under Sections 17, 34 and 51 of The Planning Act 7.1Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Downtown Heights Study Official Plan Amendment, 2025-141 1.Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Downtown Heights Study Official Plan Amendment - 2025-141.pdf2.Attachment-1 Recommended Official Plan Amendment (OPA 106).pdf3.Attachment-2 Schedule D Comparisons (existing, draft recommended).pdf4.Attachment-3 Summary of Input and Responses since the Public Meeting.pdf5.Attachment-4 Downtown Building Heights Study Staff Presentation.pdf6.Correspondence - Andrea Sinclair, MHBC Planning.pdf7.Correspondence - Tim Wood, Wood Development Group.pdf8.Correspondence - Kevin Thompson, SV Law.pdf9.Correspondence - Jean-Paul Hernandez.pdf10.Correspondence - Ryan Scott, Fusion Homes.pdf11.Correspondence - Steven Kakaletris, Zelinka Priamo Ltd.pdf12.Correspondence - David Galbraith, UP Consulting Ltd.pdfStacey Laughlin, Downtown Revitalization Advisor, and Jonathan Tinney, SvN Architects and Planners, presented on the Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Downtown Heights Study Official Plan Amendment. The following delegates spoke:Andrea SinclairTim SmithSusan WatsonChad McBainWilfred FerwerdaDavid Galbraith and Stephen Litt Council recessed for call-in delegates. (5:27 p.m.). Council reconvened (5:30 p.m.). There were no call-in delegates. Council recessed (5:31 p.m.). Council reconvened (6:02 p.m.)Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor GibsonSeconded ByCouncillor Chew That the report titled Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Downtown Heights Study Official Plan Amendment from Infrastructure, Development and Environment dated April 8 2025 be received. That the City-initiated Official Plan Amendment to modify the permitted building heights in the Downtown Secondary Plan area be approved, as shown in Attachment-1 of Report 2025-141 dated April 8, 2025. That in accordance with Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act, City Council has determined that no further public notice is required related to the minor modifications to the proposed Official Plan Amendment modifying the permitted building heights in the Downtown Secondary Plan area. First Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor GollerSeconded ByCouncillor Billings That Attachment 1 – Recommended Official Plan Amendment (OPA 106) included in the Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Downtown Heights Study Official Plan Amendment, 2025-141 report dated April 8, 2025 be amended to include the following: Further to Policy 11.1.8.4.1, in addressing the location and massing of new buildings, Urban Design Master Plans and zoning by-law amendments aligned with Urban Design Master Plans may set height limits that reflect minor adjustments to the boundaries between areas with different maximum heights in Schedule D, provided the proposed massing of buildings resulting from such adjustments meets the principles, objectives and general intent of the Downtown Secondary Plan and maintains the protected public view corridors to the Church of Our Lady.Voting in Favour: (11)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Caton, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewCarried (11 to 0)Second Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That the Norfolk/Woolwich corridor (from Oxford to London) remain 2-4 storeys, until such time as an HCD study is completed. Frist Amendment to Second Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor GollerSeconded ByCouncillor Billings That the Norfolk/Woolwich corridor (from Oxford to Edwin) remain 2-4 storeys, until such time as an HCD study is completed. Voting in Favour: (10)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Caton, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewVoting Against: (1)Councillor AlltCarried (10 to 1)Second Amendment to Main Motion as AmendedMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That the Norfolk/Woolwich corridor (from Oxford to Edwin) remain 2-4 storeys, until such time as an HCD study is completed. Voting in Favour: (7)Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewVoting Against: (4)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, and Councillor CatonCarried (7 to 4)Third Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That Section 11.1.2.1 Vision of the proposed OPA 106 be amended from:"Redevelopment will also have created opportunities for renewable and alternative energy systems and excellence in environmental design." To be replaced by:"Redevelopment will necessitate a new approach to renewable and alternative energy systems and excellence in environmental design."Voting in Favour: (11)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Caton, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewCarried (11 to 0)Fourth Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That the lands bounded by the railway to the north, Fountain Street to the south, and Wyndham Street to the east, Gordon to the west (Police Station, Armouries, Farmer's Market and Stone Store sites) be amended to a maximum of 12 storeys. Voting in Favour: (5)Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, and Councillor BusuttilVoting Against: (6)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caton, and Councillor ChewDefeated (5 to 6)Fifth Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor KlassenSeconded ByCouncillor Caron That the lands bounded by the railway to the north, Fountain Street to the south, and Wyndham Street to the east, Gordon to the west (Police Station, Armouries, Farmer's Market and Stone Store sites) be amended to a maximum of 16 storeys. Voting in Favour: (5)Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, and Councillor BusuttilVoting Against: (6)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caton, and Councillor ChewDefeated (5 to 6)Sixth Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That the street-facing lands located along Woolwich Street between Wellington and Eramosa, and Douglas Street, remain as is. Voting in Favour: (5)Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, and Councillor BusuttilVoting Against: (6)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caton, and Councillor ChewDefeated (5 to 6)Seventh Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That the view corridors to the Basilica be amended as follows: Gordon Street - restore to January 2025 version Macdonell - full street wide edge to edge from Wellington to NorfolkVoting in Favour: (6)Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, and Councillor BusuttilVoting Against: (5)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Caton, and Councillor ChewCarried (6 to 5)Eighth Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Goller That staff report back to Council by the end of Q4 2025 on potential regulatory options to require higher energy standards for tall buildings exceeding 12 storeys within the Downtown Height Study area, including but not limited to mandator net zero energy requirements, energy efficiency measures, distributed energy systems, and prohibition of installation of new fossil gas infrastructure. This motion was withdrawn by the mover and seconder. Ninth Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That staff report back to Council on potential options to encourage and incentivize higher energy standards for tall buildings exceeding 12 storeys within the Downtown Height Study area, including but not limited to net zero energy requirements, energy efficiency measures, distributed energy systems, and prohibition of installation of new fossil gas infrastructure. This motion was requested to be split into two motions.First Clause of Ninth Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Goller That staff report back to Council on potential options to encourage and incentivize higher energy standards for tall buildings exceeding 12 storeys within the Downtown Height Study area. Voting in Favour: (10)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewCarried (10 to 0)Second Clause of Ninth Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Goller That the staff report on potential options to encourage and incentivize higher energy standards for tall buildings exceeding 12 storeys within the Downtown Height Study area include, but are not limited to, net zero energy requirements, energy efficiency measures, distributed energy systems, and prohibition of installation of new fossil gas infrastructure. Voting in Favour: (8)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewVoting Against: (2)Councillor Gibson, and Councillor BillingsCarried (8 to 2)Tenth Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor KlassenSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That the west side of Gordon St. between Waterloo Ave and Surrey St. W. be amended to a maximum of 6 storeys. Voting in Favour: (6)Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, and Councillor BusuttilVoting Against: (4)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Billings, and Councillor ChewCarried (6 to 4)Eleventh Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor DownerSeconded ByCouncillor Busuttil That Attachment 1 – Recommended Official Plan Amendment (OPA 106) included in the Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Downtown Heights Study Official Plan Amendment, 2025-141 report dated April 8, 2025 be amended to require an Urban Design Master Plan for the area bounded by Surrey St, Neeve, the Metrolinx railway tracks, and Gordon Street. Voting in Favour: (7)Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewVoting Against: (3)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, and Councillor BillingsCarried (7 to 3)Twelfth Amendment to Main MotionMoved ByCouncillor ChewSeconded ByCouncillor Goller That Attachment 1 – Recommended Official Plan Amendment (OPA 106) included in the Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Downtown Heights Study Official Plan Amendment, 2025-141 report dated April 8, 2025 be amended to not make changes to existing policy 11.1.7.2.4 c so that it would continue to read “Mechanical penthouses and elevator cores shall be screened and integrated into the design of buildings”. Voting in Favour: (10)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewCarried (10 to 0)Main Motion as AmendedMoved ByCouncillor GibsonSeconded ByCouncillor Chew That the report titled Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Downtown Heights Study Official Plan Amendment from Infrastructure, Development and Environment dated April 8 2025 be received. That the City-initiated Official Plan Amendment to modify the permitted building heights in the Downtown Secondary Plan area be approved, as shown in Attachment-1 of Report 2025-141 dated April 8, 2025, as amended. That in accordance with Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act, City Council has determined that no further public notice is required related to the minor modifications to the proposed Official Plan Amendment modifying the permitted building heights in the Downtown Secondary Plan area. Voting in Favour: (8)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewVoting Against: (2)Councillor Caron, and Councillor KlassenCarried (8 to 2)7.2Public Meeting and Decision Report, Proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for 132 Clair Rd W (Block 2, Draft Plan of Subdivision 23T-15501), 2025-150 1.Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Report 132 Clair Rd W Proposed OPA ZBA File OZS25-002 Ward 6 - 2025-150.pdf2.Attachment-1 Location Map and 120 metre Circulation.pdf3.Attachment-2 Aerial Photograph.pdf4.Attachment-3 Recommended Official Plan Amendment No. 104.pdf5.Attachment-4 Recommended Zoning and Regulations.pdf6.Attachment-5 Existing Official Plan Land Use Designations and Policies.pdf7.Attachment-6 Existing Zoning, Zoning By-law (2023)-20790.pdf8.Attachment-7 Proposed Zoning, Zoning By-law (2023)-20790.pdf9.Attachment-8 Conceptual Site Plan and Building Renderings.pdf10.Attachment-9 Staff Review and Planning Analysis.pdf11.Attachment-10 Community Energy Initiative.pdf12.Attachment-11 Departmental and Agency Comments.pdf13.Attachment-12 Public Notification Summary.pdf14.Attachment-13 Staff Presentation for Public Meeting.pdf15.Correspondence - Neil Mazey, Canada Post.pdfLindsay Sulatycki, Senior Planner, presented on the Public Meeting and Decision Report, Proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for 132 Clair Rd W (Block 2, Draft Plan of Subdivision 23T-15501). The following delegate spoke:Andrea Sinclair Council recessed (8:18 p.m.). Council reconvened (8:22 p.m.)Moved ByCouncillor ChewSeconded ByCouncillor Busuttil That the Statutory Public Meeting Report regarding the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications submitted by MHBC Planning Limited on behalf of the owner, Mattamy (TruVilla) Limited to facilitate the development of 62 stacked townhouses on a portion of the lands municipally known as 132 Clair Road West and legally described as Part of Lot 11, Concession 7 (Geographic Township of Puslinch), City of Guelph, from Infrastructure, Development and Environment dated April 8, 2025 be received. That the application from MHBC Planning Limited on behalf of the owner, Mattamy (TruVilla) Limited, for an Official Plan Amendment to add a site-specific policy to the Commercial Mixed-use Centre land use designation to permit a minimum net density of 60 units per hectare to facilitate the development of 62 stacked townhouses on the subject lands municipally known as 132 Clair Road West and legally described as Part of Lot 11, Concession 7 (Geographic Township of Puslinch), City of Guelph, be approved in accordance with Attachment-3 of the Infrastructure, Development and Environment Report 2025-150, dated April 8, 2025. That the application from MHBC Planning Limited on behalf of the owner, Mattamy (TruVilla) Limited, for a Zoning By-law Amendment to change the current zoning from “Site-specific Commercial Mixed-Use Centre with a Parking Adjustment and Holding Provisions” (CMUC -16 (PA)(H21)), according to Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, to a new “Site-specific Commercial Mixed-Use Centre with a Parking Adjustment and Holding Provisions (CMUC-XX(PA)(H21)) Zone, according to Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, to facilitate the development of 62 stacked townhouses on a portion of the subject lands municipally known as 132 Clair Road West and legally described as Part of Lot 11, Concession 7 (Geographic Township of Puslinch), City of Guelph, be approved in accordance with Attachment-4 of the Infrastructure, Development and Environment Report 2025-150, dated April 8, 2025. Voting in Favour: (10)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewCarried (10 to 0)Council recessed (8:23 p.m.). Council reconvened (8:33 p.m.).8.Items for Discussion 8.1328 Victoria Road South (Frost Building) - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-140 1.328 Victoria Road South (Frost Building) - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-140.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.pdf3.Correspondence - Ryan Scott, Fusion Homes(1).pdfThe following delegates presented:Dave Aston and Ryan ScottMain MotionMoved ByCouncillor AlltSeconded ByCouncillor Busuttil That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate the Frost Building at 328 Victoria Road South pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation bylaw be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period. Deferral MotionMoved ByCouncillor GollerSeconded ByCouncillor Gibson That the designation of the Frost Building be deferred until the Block Plan for the Guelph Innovation District is presented to Guelph City Council, but no later than March 31, 2026. Voting in Favour: (7)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Billings, Councillor Klassen, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewVoting Against: (3)Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, and Councillor CaronCarried (7 to 3)8.2Stone Road and Edinburgh Road Community Planning Permit Decision Report, 2025-128 1.Stone Road and Edinburgh Road Community Planning Permit Decision Report.pdf2.Attachment-1 Official Plan No. 105 (OPA 105).pdf3.Attachment-2 City of Guelph CPP By-law.pdf4.Attachment-3 Guelph Feasibility Assessment.pdf5.Attachment-4 Planning Services delegation of authority by-law amendment for CPPS.pdf6.Attachment-5 CPPS Planning Fees Amendment.pdf7.Attachment-6 Guelph CPPS Engagement Response.pdf8.Attachment-7 CPPS Decision Meeting presentation_April 8 2025.pdf9.Correspondence - Kevin Thompson, SV Law(1).pdf10.Correspondence - Andrea Bidgood, Guelph Coalition for Active Transportation.pdfDawson McKenzie, Planner II, Affordable Housing and Justine Giancola, Dillon Consulting, presented on the Stone Road and Edinburgh Road Community Planning Permit Decision Report.Moved ByCouncillor GibsonSeconded ByCouncillor Downer That the City-initiated Official Plan Amendment to enable a Community Planning Permit System for the Stone Road/Edinburgh Road Strategic Growth Area be approved, as shown in Attachment 1 of report 2025-128 dated March 27. That the City-initiated Community Planning Permit By-law for the Stone Road/Edinburgh Road Strategic Growth Area be approved, as shown in Attachment 2 of report 2025-128 dated March 27. That the comprehensive zoning by-law 2023-20790, and where applicable, Zoning By-law (1995)-14864, as applied to the Stone Road and Edinburgh Road area as shown in Attachment 1, be repealed and replaced with the community planning permit by-law. That the amendment to the Delegation of Authority by-law Number (2024)-20994, as shown in Attachment-3, be approved. That the amendment to the Planning Fee by-law Number (2025) – 21054, as shown in Attachment-4, be approved. That in accordance with Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act, City Council has determined that no further public notice is required related to the minor modifications to the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Community Planning Permit By-law. That the General Reserve and Reserve Fund Policy be updated to reflect the updated policy terms for the Complete Community Charge reserve fund (307), Cash-in-lieu of Affordable Housing reserve fund (308), and Alternative Facilities, Services, and Matters reserve fund (309), as outlined in report 2025-128 Stone Road and Edinburgh Road Community Planning Permit Decision Report, dated April 8, 2025 Voting in Favour: (8)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, and Councillor ChewVoting Against: (1)Councillor BusuttilCarried (8 to 1)9.By-laws Moved ByCouncillor CaronSeconded ByCouncillor Allt That by-laws (2025)-21037, (2025)-21062 through (2025)-21066 and (2025)-21069 through (2025)-21071 be approved, as amended, subject to Section 284.11 (4) of the Municipal Act. Voting in Favour: (9)Mayor Guthrie, Councillor Gibson, Councillor Goller, Councillor Allt, Councillor Downer, Councillor Billings, Councillor Caron, Councillor Busuttil, and Councillor ChewCarried (9 to 0)10.Mayor’s Announcements There were no announcements.11.Adjournment Moved ByCouncillor BillingsSeconded ByCouncillor GollerThat the meeting be adjourned (9:37 p.m.).CarriedNo Item Selected This item has no attachments.1.9 and 13 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-138.pdf2.Attachment-1 Criteria to Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.pdf1.15 and 17 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-139.pdf2.Attachment-1 Criteria to Determine Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.pdf1.328 Victoria Road South (Frost Building) - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-140.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.pdf3.Correspondence - Ryan Scott, Fusion Homes(1).pdf1.136 Glasgow Street North - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-131.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(1).pdf1.30 Eramosa Road - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-102.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(2).pdf1.32 Eramosa Road - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-103.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(3).pdf1.52 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-151.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(4).pdf1.54 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-152.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(5).pdf1.56 Paisley Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-153.pdf2.Attachment-1 Ontario Regulation 9-06 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest(6).pdf1.Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Report 132 Clair Rd W Proposed OPA ZBA File OZS25-002 Ward 6 - 2025-150.pdf2.Attachment-1 Location Map and 120 metre Circulation.pdf3.Attachment-2 Aerial Photograph.pdf4.Attachment-3 Recommended Official Plan Amendment No. 104.pdf5.Attachment-4 Recommended Zoning and Regulations.pdf6.Attachment-5 Existing Official Plan Land Use Designations and Policies.pdf7.Attachment-6 Existing Zoning, Zoning By-law (2023)-20790.pdf8.Attachment-7 Proposed Zoning, Zoning By-law (2023)-20790.pdf9.Attachment-8 Conceptual Site Plan and Building Renderings.pdf10.Attachment-9 Staff Review and Planning Analysis.pdf11.Attachment-10 Community Energy Initiative.pdf12.Attachment-11 Departmental and Agency Comments.pdf13.Attachment-12 Public Notification Summary.pdf14.Attachment-13 Staff Presentation for Public Meeting.pdf15.Correspondence - Neil Mazey, Canada Post.pdf1.Statutory Public Meeting and Decision Downtown Heights Study Official Plan Amendment - 2025-141.pdf2.Attachment-1 Recommended Official Plan Amendment (OPA 106).pdf3.Attachment-2 Schedule D Comparisons (existing, draft recommended).pdf4.Attachment-3 Summary of Input and Responses since the Public Meeting.pdf5.Attachment-4 Downtown Building Heights Study Staff Presentation.pdf6.Correspondence - Andrea Sinclair, MHBC Planning.pdf7.Correspondence - Tim Wood, Wood Development Group.pdf8.Correspondence - Kevin Thompson, SV Law.pdf9.Correspondence - Jean-Paul Hernandez.pdf10.Correspondence - Ryan Scott, Fusion Homes.pdf11.Correspondence - Steven Kakaletris, Zelinka Priamo Ltd.pdf12.Correspondence - David Galbraith, UP Consulting Ltd.pdf1.Stone Road and Edinburgh Road Community Planning Permit Decision Report.pdf2.Attachment-1 Official Plan No. 105 (OPA 105).pdf3.Attachment-2 City of Guelph CPP By-law.pdf4.Attachment-3 Guelph Feasibility Assessment.pdf5.Attachment-4 Planning Services delegation of authority by-law amendment for CPPS.pdf6.Attachment-5 CPPS Planning Fees Amendment.pdf7.Attachment-6 Guelph CPPS Engagement Response.pdf8.Attachment-7 CPPS Decision Meeting presentation_April 8 2025.pdf9.Correspondence - Kevin Thompson, SV Law(1).pdf10.Correspondence - Andrea Bidgood, Guelph Coalition for Active Transportation.pdf